Difference between revisions of "ResClim Bergen subgroup"

m
m
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
# Short introduction about the idea
 
# Short introduction about the idea
 
 
# Discussion (Depending on the number of people maybe divide into subgroups)
 
# Discussion (Depending on the number of people maybe divide into subgroups)
 
## Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs
 
## Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs
Line 16: Line 15:
 
## Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?)
 
## Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?)
 
## What kind of meeting format should we have?
 
## What kind of meeting format should we have?
 
 
 
 
# Core group?
 
# Core group?
 
## Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...
 
## Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...
 
 
# Next 'meeting'
 
# Next 'meeting'
 
## Ideas?
 
## Ideas?

Revision as of 17:13, 3 May 2013


For discussion, problem solving, socilizing etc.

Meetings

8.5.2012 - 15:00 - Kick off - Helland Hansen at GFI

Agenda

  1. Short introduction about the idea
  2. Discussion (Depending on the number of people maybe divide into subgroups)
    1. Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs
      1. If we think this is the case should we just divide immeadately?
    2. Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?)
    3. What kind of meeting format should we have?
  3. Core group?
    1. Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...
  4. Next 'meeting'
    1. Ideas?