Difference between revisions of "ResClim Bergen subgroup"

m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
# Short introduction about the idea
 
# Short introduction about the idea
 
# Discussion (Depending on the number of people maybe divide into subgroups)
 
# Discussion (Depending on the number of people maybe divide into subgroups)
## Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs
+
#* Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs
### If we think this is the case should we just divide immeadately?
+
#** If we think this is the case should we just divide immeadately?
## Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?)
+
#* Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?)
## What kind of meeting format should we have?
+
#* What kind of meeting format should we have?
 
# Core group?
 
# Core group?
## Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...
+
#* Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...
 
# Next 'meeting'
 
# Next 'meeting'
## Ideas?
+
#* Ideas?

Revision as of 17:14, 3 May 2013


For discussion, problem solving, socilizing etc.

Meetings

8.5.2012 - 15:00 - Kick off - Helland Hansen at GFI

Agenda

  1. Short introduction about the idea
  2. Discussion (Depending on the number of people maybe divide into subgroups)
    • Should there be two separate groups for PhD's and Post Docs
      • If we think this is the case should we just divide immeadately?
    • Who should be involved? (whole BCCR community?)
    • What kind of meeting format should we have?
  3. Core group?
    • Since nothing works without responsible persons we should probably decide who want to be in charge of organizing meetings etc. Maybe these persons could use their 25% duty for this work...
  4. Next 'meeting'
    • Ideas?