Lab: RDFS

Topics

Simple RDFS statements/triples
Basic RDFS programming in RDFlib
Basic RDFS reasoning with OWL-RL

Useful materials

rdflib classes/interfaces and attributes:

RDF (RDF.type)
RDFS (RDFS.domain, RDFS.range, RDFS.subClassOf, RDFS.subPropertyOf)
Lab Presentation of RDFS

OWL-RL:

OWL-RL classes/interfaces:

RDFSClosure, RDFS_Semantics

Tasks

Task: Install OWL-RL into your virtual environment:

pip install owlrl

Task: We will use simple RDF statements from the Mueller investigation RDF graph you create in Exercise 1. Create a new rdflib graph and add triples to represent that:

Rick Gates was charged with money laundering and tax evasion.

Use RDFS terms to add these rules as triples:

When one thing that is charged with another thing,
- the first thing is a person under investigation and
- the second thing is an offense.

To add triples, you can use either:

simple graph.add((s, p, o)) statements or
INSERT DATA {...} SPARQL updates.

If you use SPARQL updates, you can define a namespace dictionary like this:

EX = Namespace('http://example.org#')
NS = {
    'ex': EX,
    'rdf': RDF,
    'rdfs': RDFS,
    'foaf': FOAF,
}

You can then give NS as an optional argument to graph.update() - or to graph.query() - like this:

g.update("""
    # when you provide an initNs-argument, you do not have 
    # to define PREFIX-es as part of the update (or query)

    INSERT DATA {
        # the triples you want to add go here,
        # you can use the prefixes defined in the NS-dict
    }
""", initNs=NS)

Task:

Write a SPARQL query that checks the RDF type(s) of Rick Gates in your RDF graph.
Write a similar SPARQL query that checks the RDF type(s) of money laundering in your RDF graph.
Write a small function that computes the RDFS closure on your graph.
Re-run the SPARQL queries to check the types of Rick Gates and of money laundering again: have they changed?

You can compute the RDFS closure on a graph g like this:

import owlrl

owlrl.DeductiveClosure(owlrl.RDFS_Semantics).expand(g)

Task: Use RDFS terms to add this rule as a triple:

A person under investigation is a FOAF person.
Like earlier, check the RDF types of Rick Gates before and after running RDFS reasoning. Do they change?

Task: Add in "plain RDF" as in Exercise 1:

Paul Manafort was convicted for tax evasion.

Use RDFS terms to add these rules as triples:

When one thing is convicted for another thing,
- the first thing is also charged with the second thing.

Note: we are dealing with a "timeless" graph here, that represents facts that has held at "some points in time", but not necessarily at the same time.

What are the RDF types of Paul Manafort and of tax evasion before and after RDFS reasoning?
Does the RDFS domain and range of the convicted for property change?

If you have more time...

Task:

Create a Turtle file with all the RDF and RDFS triples from the earlier tasks.
Go to a local or online Blazegraph. Create a new Blazegraph namespace and Use it. (Remember that namespaces in Blazegraph and rdflib have nothing to do with one another.)
Go to the Upload tab to add the triples into your new Blazegraph namespace.
Go through each of the above queries to confirm that Blazegraph has not performed any RDFS reasoning.

You can also list all the triples in the namespace to ensure that nothing has been added:

SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o }

Task:

Create another Blazegraph namespace, but this time with the inference box checked. Use the new namespace.
List all the triples in the new inferencing namespace. (What you see are the axioms in RDFS.) How many are there?
Upload the triples into your new inferencing Blazegraph namespace.
List all the triples again. How many have been added?
Go through each of the above queries to ensure that Blazegraph (with inference) has reasoned as you expect.